Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Chris' GREAT Reading Assessment Data Table!


Thanks to Ronald (Chris) Maiuri for permission to use this very extensive SEA project done in the Spring of 2013.





SEA: Reading Assessment Data Table with introduction, chart and references.

            Reading diagnostic test are a critical tool in the arsenal of any teacher, but which test is the right test?  Reading tests are not one size fits all and a teacher must use the appropriate test for the particular student and targeted skill in question.  These tests vary in the skill(s) they are testing for, age and grade level of the student, frequency with which they can be taken, the length of time they take to administer, and their cost.  In the following paper I discuss six of the most popular and effective reading diagnostic tests:  the Slosson Intelligence Test, the Slosson Oral Reading Test, Basic Reading Inventory, Wepman’s Test of Auditory Discrimination, Test of Visual Perceptual Skills, and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing.
            The Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) is primarily used to test the cognitive ability of a student, mental patient or mentally handicapped person. The SIT is a screening tool that is used in the first step of identifying individuals that are on the low end of the intelligence scale as well as those who are gifted.  Since it is considered an initial screening test only, it is not used as a determiner of final placement decisions.  It is comprised of 187 questions that look at six cognitive domains.  The domains are; vocabulary, general information, similarities and differences, comprehension, quantitative memory, and auditory memory. 
            One of the positives of the SIT test is that the manual is user friendly and fairly straight forward.  The size and makeup of the norm sample is a very nice feature as well.  The norms were obtained from 1,854 children from all areas of the United States.  Another positive aspect of this test is that it is very cost friendly.  While this test is certainly not the fastest of the diagnostic tests, it is not overly time consuming.  Finally, the test can be given to students as young as four years old up to the age of eighteen.    
            This test does, however, have some limitations as well.  The norms for this test are not disaggregated in reference to those individuals who would be described as learning disabled or gifted.  Also, because the SIT is a verbal test and minorities are underrepresented in the norms, it may be less useful in our increasingly multicultural society.  Perhaps the most limiting aspect of this test is the recommendation that anyone administering the test has a graduate degree in psychology or education and has taken a course in testing and measurement.
            The Slosson Oral Reading Test or SORT is a tool for assessing word recognition level and decoding skills.  The SORT uses sets of 20 words and there are 200 words total. The student reads words off of lists until he or she misses a word.  The administrator will find the grade level that matches the student’s performance.  The SORT is a norm-referenced assessment that provides estimates of grade and age equivalents, standard scores, and national percentiles.
            This test has several advantages.  It can be administered to children and adolescents from first through twelfth grade.  Words were selected from reading lists and textbooks at selected grade levels so that they represent a steady progression of difficulty from the first grade through the high school level. Another advantage of the SORT is that it is aligned with the new Common Core Standards and it will probably be valid for quite some time.  Also, there is convincing evidence for the reliability and validity of the SORT assessment tool and the test seems to have adequate reliability. Administration of the test takes only about three to five minutes depending on how well the subject performs. 
            The SORT does not come without its faults, however.  Because the words were not chosen according to their phonic characteristics, this test cannot be used to determine a person's knowledge of grapheme/phoneme relationships.  Also, it is intended to be used for screening purposes and is not useful as a continual progress monitoring tool to measure a student’s growth.  Due to the word recognition nature of the test, it does not address comprehension whatsoever.  Perhaps the biggest pitfall of the test is its lack of sensitivity to cultural differences.  The test does not provide norms that are disaggregated by individuals of differing cultures or needs.
            The Basic Reading Inventory (BRI) assesses three key components in reading fluency; accuracy, rate, and comprehension.  This test is used to identify students who are struggling in reading as well as to monitor progress of student performance and growth.  This test can be used to determine appropriate intervention in classrooms which often focus on phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.  It can successfully determine the level and type of instruction that will be the most helpful for each student.  This allows a teacher to provide differentiated instruction aimed at particular students.  The BRI points out a student’s strengths as well as their needs. 
            This test is applicable to students from preschool through high school.  The BRI finds a student’s independent, instructional, and frustration levels.  The independent level is the level at which a student reads fluently with excellent comprehension. The instructional level is the level at which a student is challenged but not overwhelmed, typically understanding roughly 95 percent of the words.  This level is where students will learn the most.  The frustration level is the level at which a student is unable to pronounce many of the words or is unable to successfully comprehend the material. 
            Unlike other tests, the BRI is extremely effective in assessing a student’s comprehension by following each passage with questions about topic, facts, inference, evaluation, and vocabulary.  The test is not as quick to administer as the SIT, but does not take more than an hour or so, making it fairly time friendly.  The reliability and validity studies are disappointing at best due to the small sample size of studies performed which were all under 100 students each.
            Wepman’s Test of Auditory Discrimination assesses children’s ability to recognize differences between phonemes used in English speech. This test can identify children who are struggling with the development of auditory discrimination; this is crucial in the learning of phonics.  Because younger children are included in the norm sample, the ADT can be used for preschool and kindergarten screening as well as elementary school assessment. Forty pairs of words are read out loud, and the child indicates, verbally or by making hand gestures, whether the words in each pair are the same or different. 
            The Wepman’s Test has many positive aspects associated with it.  First, it is very quick to administer, the entire test can be given and scored in just 5 minutes.  Also, the norms for this test were based on a nice sized, diverse sample of 1,885 children ages 4-8 years, from 30 states.  Unlike the SORT, the Wepman’s norms represent different ethnic and SES backgrounds. It provides standard scores and percentile norms at half-year intervals for children between the ages of 4 and 8 years.
            There are some cautions about the Wepman’s test that must be pointed out.  While the norm sample is sensitive to SES, the test itself may include a vocabulary bias against low SES and cultural or linguistically different children.  Another concern is that performance on this test can be affected by hearing loss, poor listening skills, and attention deficit disorder. Finally, and perhaps most compelling, is an overall lack of evidence of a connection between test results and true reading level of the tested students.
            The Test of Visual Perceptual Skills 3rd Edition (TVPS-3) is intended to give a reliable and valid measure of a child’s perceptual abilities.  Since visual perceptual abilities are used in a number of academic pursuits, including learning to read, it is important to know which processes the child may be having difficulty with.  The TVPS-3 may also be used to track progress over time and for research. TVPS-3 utilizes 112 black and white designs organized in seven subtests.  The TVPS-3 is in a multiple choice format where the child indicates their choice verbally or by pointing.   
            There are many strengths of this test.  The test can be administered to a very large range of ages from 4 through 19.  Also, the student can respond in a number of ways including verbally, or by raising a hand, etc.  The norms for this test were established with a fairly large sample of 2,000 students.   The TVPS-3 has a high level of homogeneity, it provides consistent measurement from one testing to the next, and it can be consistently scored by different examiners.  The test can be administered to children with no diagnosed disabilities as well as to children with speech, cognitive, neurological, motor, or other impairments.  The use of black and white photos eliminates results that may otherwise be associated with color blindness.
            There are very few down sides to this particular test of visual perception.  One of the weaknesses of this test is that the scoring can be quite difficult and confusing.  Also, administration of the test can take well over half an hour, making it frustrating and confusing for the administrator and the student.  Overall, this test is inexpensive with many more positives than drawbacks.  
            The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing Version 2 (CTOPP-2) is a test that is designed to assess phonological awareness and processing. Children experiencing difficulty in these areas may have more difficulty reading than those who do not. The CTOPP can be used to identify students who are significantly below their peers in phonological abilities, to determine strengths and weaknesses in development of phonological skills, and to measure a child’s progress in phonological processing as a consequence of intervention programs. This test was developed to be administered to students age 7 through 24.  The CTOPP-2 test takes approximately 30 minutes to complete.
              The CTOPP-2 has many positive aspects.  It is extremely comprehensive in its results.  It provides percentiles, standard scores, and age grade equivalents. Percentiles are easily understood by parents and others with whom the examiner might want to share the results. The test was normed on 1,900 individuals ranging in age from 6 through 24 years. The norms associated with this test are very representative of the U.S. population. The cost of the test is $330.
            The ability to read fluently and fully comprehend what is being read is crucial to the development of a child.  For many children the ability to read successfully and skillfully comes naturally.  For other children, reading can be difficult, frustrating, and even terrifying.  For those children who do struggle with reading there is hope.  Whether they have difficulty with phoneme awareness, vocabulary, visual perception, or even comprehension, there are tests available to uncover these difficulties.  I have highlighted a few of the most popular tests available today.  The SIT, SORT, BRI, Wepman’s, TVPS-3, and CTOPP-2 are all excellent tests and very effective at diagnosing specific reading problems that children have.
COMPARISON OF READING DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENTS
TEST
PURPOSE
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
APPROPRIATNESS
SLOSSON INTELLIGENCE TEST (SIT)
-Used to measure intellectual abilities.
-Predicts reading achievement.
-Quick and easy to administer.
-Can be administered at an early age.
-Cannot be used for children younger than 4 years old.
-Administered at the beginning of the school year for placement & educational planning.
SLOSSON ORAL READING TEST (SORT)
-Used to determine level of oral word recognition and reading level.
-Used to evaluate progress from year to year.
-Very quick/easy to administer.
-Can be used at a very young age.
-Does not measure vocabulary or comprehension.
-Not good for visual learners.
-Can be used at every grade level.
-Used at the beginning of the year to determine grade level and end to determine progress.
BASIC READING INVENTORY (BRI)
-Used to determine reading grade level by word recognition, speed, and comprehension.
-Can be used at every grade level.
-Simple to administer.
-Can identify individual strengths and weaknesses.
-Fairly lengthy process to administer.
-Lack of focus to can skew results.
-Can be used pre instruction to determine education plan and post instruction to measure improvement.
WEPMAN’S TEST OF AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION
-Used to determine problems with phonological awareness and phonemes.
-Very quick and easy to administer.  5 minutes to administer entire test.
-Can be given to very young children.
-Very inexpensive.
-Limited because it cannot be used to identify specific learning disabilities. 
-Can be used at half year intervals for children 4-8 years old to determine baseline and progress with phonemic discrimination.
TEST OF VISUAL PERCEPTUAL SKILLS (TVPS-3)
-Used to give a reliable measure of perceptual abilities.
-Can also track progress over time.
-Large age range of 4-19 yrs.
-Many ways to respond (verbally, hand gestures, etc.)
-Scoring is quite difficult and confusing.
-Takes a long time to administer.
-Good for testing with children with other disabilities.
-Is capable of tracking progress.
COMPREHENSIVE TEST OF PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSING (CTOPP-2)
-Measure of phonological coding.
-Used to determine etiology of severe reading disorders.
-Test is lengthy with many subtests and is expensive.
-Used to differentiate learning disabilities from other causes of academic failure.
References
Johns, J. (2012). Basic reading inventory. (11th Ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
McKechnie, J., & Bradley, E. (2001). Test review: slosson intelligence test - revised (sit-r). Retrieved from                 http://aac.ncat.edu/newsnotes/y01win.html
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing.               Retrieved from http://www.mhs.com/product.aspx?gr=edu&prod=ctopp&id=overview
Pro Ed. (2013). CTOPP-2: Comprehensive test of phonological processing – second edition. Retrieved      from http://www.proedinc.com/customer/productView.aspx?id=5187
Slosson oral reading test. (2012). Retrieved from                 http://www.kentuckyliteracy.org/sites/ccldzen/files/literacy_tool/tools/Slosson Oral Reading Test.pdf
Therapy BC. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.therapybc.ca/
Western Psychological Services. (1987). Wepman’s auditory discrimination test, second edition.                Retrieved from http://www.ecasd.k12.wi.us/student_services/assessments/ADT.pdf







































No comments:

Post a Comment